Updated: June 2024
Table of Contents
Help guide: Purchased goods and services v2. 1
Purchased goods and services (PG&S). 1
Learn more: Actionable steps (PG&S Insights) 4
Section Overview: Engage for Reduction.. 4
Section Overview: Engage for Reduction.. 7
Introduction to Insights Bubble Chart
This bubble chart is a visual representation of your supply chain data and emissions. This allows you to categorize suppliers and commodities and determine the best next steps for your sustainability program. This categorization is based on the availability of primary data and each commodities relative mitigation potential. This structured approach helps businesses focus their efforts more effectively on high-impact areas.
Understanding the Categories
Suppliers and commodities are first sorted into different sections depending on the amount and quality of primary data available. Primary data refers to direct data collected from activities within the company's control or supply chain, providing a granular insight into emission sources. This categorization allows companies to identify which areas have enough data coverage and which areas may need further data collection efforts.
Mitigation potential is evaluated based on the decarbonization opportunities within a particular industry or commodity. This was done by assessing how feasible it is to implement changes that reduce emissions. Industries with high mitigation potential are typically those that have existing technologies or practices that can be adopted to achieve emission reductions.
Recommended Actions for Scope 3 Inventory Improvement
For each section identified, our platform recommends specific actions that businesses can take to improve their Scope 3 PG&S inventory management. These actions are tailored based on the data availability and mitigation potential of each section. Users can then prioritize their supply chain efforts more effectively, focusing on areas where the impact of emission reductions and engaging with suppliers can be expanded.
Interactive Features
High Data Availability and High Mitigation Potential
This section highlights commodities and suppliers that have primary emissions data and also have high mitigation potential. This combination makes them good targets for impactful sustainability initiatives and emission reductions.
Understanding High Data Availability
High data availability means that there is a good amount of accurate and reliable primary emissions data. This data typically includes detailed information their scope 1 & 2 emissions and could come from publicly available data sources (e.g. CDP) or directly submitted data in the supplier module. This level of data enables precise measurement and management of emissions, allowing for emission reduction efforts to be seen in your inventory. This is why we recommend focusing on these suppliers and commodities for effective decarbonization strategies.
High Mitigation Potential Explained
High mitigation potential indicates that there are significant opportunities for implementing decarbonization measures within these industries or commodities. This might involve adopting new technologies, changing operational practices, or utilizing cleaner energy sources. Industries and suppliers with high mitigation potential are capable of making reductions in their emissions.
Direct Impact on Scope 3 Emissions
Focusing on suppliers with both high data availability and high mitigation potential allows businesses to directly influence and reduce their Scope 3 emissions. By working with suppliers who can decarbonize their operations, a company can achieve considerable reductions in these indirect emissions and see progress since they are providing accurate data.
Benefits of Targeting High-Potential Suppliers
Actionable Steps
Companies should engage with these high-potential suppliers to explore specific decarbonization projects, set ambitious yet achievable emission reduction targets, and collaborate on achieving these goals through improvements in practices and technologies. Supporting suppliers through knowledge sharing, and joint investments can further enhance the effectiveness of these initiatives. These suppliers are also suppliers that should be engaged for setting emission reduction targets, for example a formal science-based target (SBT) through the science-based target initiative (SBTi).
Section Overview: Reduce Use
In this section, we focus on commodities and suppliers characterized by high primary data coverage but low mitigation potential. These are often associated with industries that are difficult to reduce emissions from (e.g. Oil & Gas).
High Primary Data Coverage Explained
High primary data coverage means that detailed and reliable data on emissions and is readily available for these commodities and suppliers. This data provides a clear picture of current practices and their GHG footprints, making it easier to identify where changes and reductions can be most effectively made.
Understanding Low Mitigation Potential
Low mitigation potential indicates that there are limited opportunities for these suppliers or commodities to significantly reduce their emissions through conventional decarbonization strategies. This might be due to technological limitations, cost constraints, or the intrinsic nature of the materials and processes used. Despite the challenge in reducing emissions, the high environmental impact of these materials makes them critical targets for alternative strategies.
Direct Impact on High-Impact Materials
Since conventional strategies for emission reduction are less viable, focusing on reducing the use of these high-impact materials becomes the best option. This can mean decreasing the quantity used, finding alternative materials, or rethinking production methods.
Actionable Steps for Buyers
Buyers are encouraged to consider strategies such as:
In the "Engage for Reduction" section, we address commodities and suppliers for which emissions have been calculated using standard commodity emissions factors or proxy data. This method is generally less precise compared to direct emissions data from suppliers. The section highlights the importance of engaging with suppliers to improve the accuracy of emissions data and the effectiveness of emissions reduction strategies.
Standard Commodity Emissions Factors
These are generalized emissions values assigned to commodities based on industry averages or typical production processes. While useful for initial estimates, they lack the specificity and detail provided by primary data, which can lead to inaccuracies in understanding the true emissions impact of specific commodities or suppliers.
Proxy Data
Proxy data is used as a substitute for actual emissions data when direct data is unavailable. It involves estimating emissions based on similar operations or industry norms. Like standard emissions factors, proxy data serves as a rough estimate and can significantly benefit from refinement and validation through primary data collection.
The Need for Engaging with Suppliers
Engaging with suppliers to obtain more accurate and detailed emissions data is important for:
Actionable Steps for Engagement
We use several approaches to calculate purchased goods and services (PGS) and capital goods emissions. We also allow users to bring emissions calculated elsewhere into our system. We use a hierarchy based on the methodology used to calculate emissions to determine which emissions calculations ultimately go into your inventory.
Emissions calculation hierarchy
|
Source |
Methodology |
1 |
Externally calculated |
Product-specific life cycle assessment |
2 |
Supplier reported |
Physical allocation |
3 |
Supplier reported |
Revenue allocation |
4 |
Sustain.Life supplier database |
Revenue allocation |
5 |
Sustain.Life supplier proxy |
Revenue allocation |
6 |
Externally calculated |
Average-data method |
7 |
Sustain.Life commodity database |
Spend-based method |
8 |
Sustain.Life commodity proxy |
Spend-based method |
Externally calculated – Product-specific life cycle assessment
If you have externally calculated emissions associated with your purchase transactions, for example reflecting product-specific life cycle assessments, you can enter them into the application using the override column in the purchases upload.
Supplier Reported – Physical Allocation
When you request emissions from a supplier, we send them a notification of the request. If the supplier chooses to allocate by units produced, labor hours, or some other output unit, we ask for the following information:
We then allocate emissions to your company by dividing the units furnished into the total number of units produced. We multiply the resulting factor by the supplier’s relevant emissions (scope 1, scope 2, and scope 3 categories 1, 4, and 5) to get your scope 3 emissions from the supplier.
Supplier Reported – Revenue Allocation
When you request emissions from a supplier, we send them a notification of the request. If the supplier chooses to allocate by revenue, we request the following information:
We then allocate emissions to your company by dividing the revenue from your company into the total revenue of the supplier. We multiply the resulting factor by the supplier’s relevant emissions (scope 1, scope 2, and scope 3 categories 1, 4, and 5) to get your scope 3 emissions from the supplier.
Sustain.Life Supplier Database – Revenue Allocation
If your supplier is found in our database of suppliers, we use our emission factor for that supplier and multiply it by your spending with that supplier. Our database is compiled from publicly reported emissions and revenue data. The emission factors in our database are composed of scope 1, scope 2, and scope 3 categories 1, 4, and 5. When selected emissions factors from the database, we select the most recently reported data relative to the year you are calculating emissions for.
It is common for companies in our database to only report scope 1 and scope 2 emissions. When this occurs, we model their scope 3 emissions to create an emissions factor.
Sustain.Life Supplier Database – Supplier Proxy
If you have enough data reported from suppliers (either directly or from the Sustain.Life database) within a specific commodity, we use the reported data you have received to create a proxy emissions factor. We apply that proxy factor to the remaining spend in the commodity.
This is because supplier-reported data is always more accurate then using environmental-extended input output (EEIO) data for calculating emissions. When you are working in Purchases, we check to see what percentage of spend in each commodity has supplier-reported data. When that percentage exceeds a set threshold, we create an emissions factor by dividing the total reported emissions by the total spend covered by reported data. We then multiply that by the remaining spend in the commodity that does not have reported data.
Externally Calculated – Average-data Method
We do not directly support calculating emissions via the average-data method in our app because this approach is time-consuming and does not yield high quality emissions data. We do, however, support our users in bringing in data that has been calculated externally into their inventory (e.g. via a consultant).
Sustain.Life Commodity Database – Spend-based Method
After mapping your internal spend categories to our commodities, we multiply the emissions factor for that commodity by your spend to calculate emissions. We select from one of two sets of emission factors, one set with markup and one set without markup. If you indicate the product was bought at the retail level we choose the emissions factor with markup, if you select wholesale we use the emissions factor without markup.
Sustain.Life Commodity Proxy – Spend-based Method
In lieu of any better data from the one of the above sources, we apply a commodity-based proxy emission factor to your unmapped data. We develop this factor by taking your total emissions from mapped commodities and dividing into the total spend for the same commodities. We then multiply this factor by any remaining spend.
Inflation
The above revenue allocation and spend-based methods are sensitive to changes in inflation. We use government-reported annual inflation rates to convert revenue/spend values into the same year of the emissions factor we use.
Limitations
While the spend-based approach is effective for providing an initial estimate for emissions from purchases, because it is based on general commodity emission factors, it cannot provide supplier-specific emissions estimates. For example, switching to a supplier with lower emissions will not be reflected in a spend-based analysis since the EEIO commodity factor would remain the same.
Furthermore, this approach estimates emissions based on $ spent, so only reductions in spending will show reductions in emissions. In instances where environmentally preferable products and services are more expensive than their traditional counterparts (which is common), a spend-based approach will estimate higher emissions for the environmentally preferable alternative. Lastly, because the most reliable spend-based emission factors are based on an analysis of the U.S. economy, they may provide less accurate results for spending that occurs outside of the U.S.
Despite these drawbacks, spend-based analyses still provide value in instructing organizations where to start when it comes to gathering more information or implementing policies. Results from this calculator should be used as a springboard for supplier-engagement surveys to collect specific supplier emissions data. By extrapolating mapped emissions onto unmapped categories (when the used does not map 100% of their spending), we assume that emissions of unmapped categories reflect emissions of the user’s mapped categories.
For this reason, we require the user to map a minimum of 75% of their spending so that such extrapolation does not have a large impact on overall emissions. However, in cases where the user does not map particularly GHG-intensive categories, it could reduce the accuracy of our emissions calculation. To avoid this, users should map 100% of their spending.
Copyright 2025 Sustain.Life All rights reserved